GetCybr vs Drata: Purpose-Built for MSP Delivery
The MSP-First Difference
MSPs and security consultancies choose GetCybr over Drata for three core reasons.
Built for MSP Delivery, Not Internal Teams
Drata is built for a company's internal compliance and security team. GetCybr is built for MSPs and security consultancies delivering those services to multiple clients. The platform architecture, reporting model, billing structure, and dashboards are all designed for multi-client service delivery — not retrofitted from a single-tenant product.
Per-Client Pricing That Aligns With Your Revenue
Drata's seat-based or per-company pricing model creates an unpredictable cost structure for MSPs managing multiple clients. GetCybr charges per client, per year. As you onboard new clients, your GetCybr cost scales with the revenue those clients generate — not ahead of it.
TPRM and Risk Quantification Included
GetCybr includes third-party risk management and AI-driven financial-impact risk scoring in every tier. Drata's TPRM functionality is an add-on cost, and its risk capabilities are focused on compliance status rather than business-context risk quantification. GetCybr gives you the full GRC toolkit without assembling it piecemeal.
GetCybr vs Drata: Side by Side
A factual comparison focused on the capabilities that matter most for MSP and vCISO practice delivery.
| Feature | Drata | GetCybr |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-client architecture | Single-tenant per account | Multi-tenant, built for portfolios |
| vCISO workflow support | Not designed for service providers | Core platform capability |
| White-label reporting | Limited — internal reporting focus | Included on all tiers |
| Per-client billing | Seat-based or per-company licensing | Per client / year — pay as you grow |
| TPRM included | Add-on cost | Included in all tiers |
| Custom frameworks | Available on higher tiers | Unlimited on Enterprise & Self-Hosted |
| Self-hosted option | Not available | Full self-hosted tier |
| Portfolio dashboard | Single company view only | Cross-portfolio visibility |
| Risk quantification | Compliance status tracking | Financial-impact risk scoring, AI-driven |
| Pricing model | Seat-based, scales expensively for MSPs | Per-client / year — predictable and fair |
Comparison based on publicly available information as of early 2026. Feature availability may vary by plan.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I use Drata to manage multiple clients?
Drata is designed for a single company's internal compliance programme. Managing multiple client organisations requires separate Drata accounts — each with its own licence. There is no native multi-client portfolio view, cross-client reporting, or practice-level analytics. GetCybr is purpose-built for MSPs managing multiple clients simultaneously.
What compliance frameworks does GetCybr support that Drata also covers?
Both GetCybr and Drata support major frameworks including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and NIST CSF. GetCybr additionally supports unlimited custom frameworks on Enterprise and Self-Hosted tiers — so you can add any framework your clients require, including sector-specific or bespoke frameworks.
Does GetCybr offer the same evidence automation as Drata?
Yes. GetCybr includes automated evidence collection through integrations with your client's toolstack. Evidence is pulled automatically, mapped to framework controls, and centralised in the platform — so you can produce audit-ready packages without manual evidence gathering. GetCybr also adds risk quantification, multi-client dashboards, and TPRM that go beyond evidence automation.
How does the pricing compare for an MSP with 10 clients?
With Drata, managing 10 clients typically means 10 separate company licences — a flat cost regardless of how those clients are sized. GetCybr charges per client, per year, with one unified platform to manage all 10. As your practice grows from 10 to 20 to 50 clients, GetCybr's per-client model scales predictably with your revenue.
What is the best alternative to Drata for managed service providers?
GetCybr is purpose-built for MSPs and security consultancies delivering compliance services to multiple clients. Unlike Drata's seat-based pricing model designed for single companies, GetCybr uses per-client-per-year pricing, multi-tenant architecture, and white-label reporting — making it the cost-effective choice for service providers scaling their GRC practice.
How does per-client pricing compare to seat-based pricing for MSPs?
Per-client pricing, as used by GetCybr, charges based on the number of client organisations you manage — not the number of staff on your team. This means you can grow your internal team without increasing platform costs. Seat-based models like Drata's charge per user, which penalises MSPs that hire more analysts or consultants.
See how GetCybr also compares to Vanta and spreadsheet-based delivery.
Not Ready for a Demo?
Join 500+ security leaders getting weekly vCISO insights, compliance updates, and threat intelligence.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
See Why MSPs Choose GetCybr Over Drata
Schedule a 30-minute walkthrough and see how GetCybr's multi-client architecture fits your practice delivery model.